|
View Poll Results: Which do you prefer?
|
|
Fluid
|
  
|
23 |
34.33% |
|
Fixed width
|
  
|
44 |
65.67% |
 |
|
02-15-2007, 08:29 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
v7n Mentor
Join Date: 11-01-06
Posts: 4,048
|
Fixed width. Fewer surprises. Fewer smooshed designs. More Happy CRT-tanned surfers. Yay for them!
|
|
|
02-16-2007, 08:19 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: 11-07-06
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 9
Latest Blog: None
|
Its easier to design and code a fixed width, but a well designed fluid design as long as it is well done can be much better. The problem is their are too many very badly designed fluid sites about.
|
|
|
02-16-2007, 03:44 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
The Amazing Lizza
Join Date: 12-26-06
Posts: 1,346
|
My vote goes to fixed width 
|
|
|
02-17-2007, 03:10 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
The McLickerator
Join Date: 05-31-04
Location: Where do any of us *really* live, I ask you?
Posts: 5,124
|
Ya, fixed for me aswell.
|
|
|
02-17-2007, 11:23 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-13-03
Location: England.
Posts: 3,886
Latest Blog: None
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbutton
Its easier to design and code a fixed width, but a well designed fluid design as long as it is well done can be much better. The problem is their are too many very badly designed fluid sites about.
|
I don't even agree here mate. I really don't like the content shifting around as i moved and contract the window. One size for all is just the best way to go about it, in my opinion of course 
|
|
|
02-18-2007, 02:38 AM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 27,027
|
|
|
|
02-18-2007, 05:06 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-13-03
Location: England.
Posts: 3,886
Latest Blog: None
|
Don't like any of 'em! 
|
|
|
02-25-2007, 06:12 AM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: 12-30-05
Posts: 4
Latest Blog: None
|
Is your dislike for fluid from a designer perspective or an end user perspective? I get the designer angle but not the end user. Could some of use please elaborate I'm extremely interested in hearing your responses.
|
|
|
02-25-2007, 06:19 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 27,027
|
Welcome to v7n, GrayWolf! Happy to have you here. 
|
|
|
02-25-2007, 06:25 AM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: 12-30-05
Posts: 4
Latest Blog: None
|
Here's how I do fluid 3 column and get the body first easy-peesy
HTML Code:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<head>
<title>Page Title</title>
<style type="text/css">
/*** The Layout Styles ***/
html {background:#fff;}
body {background: #fff;padding:0; margin:0;}
#header{position:absolute;top:0;clear:both;height:150px;margin:5px 25px;width:93%; }
#content {position:absolute;float:left;text-align:left;left:250px;right:250px !important; right:190px;}
#menu{position:relative;margin-left:0px;width:200px;float:left;text-align:left;}
#feat{position:relative;right:0px;width:200px;float:right;text-align:left;}
#footer {position:static;font-size:xx-small;text-align:center;clear:both;}
#container{margin-top:155px;float:left;width:100%;}
#wrap{margin:0 25px;width:95%;}
/*** Main Decoration and Color ***/
body {font-family:verdana,arial,sans-serif,serif;font-size:small;}
#header{background:#fff;}
#content {clear:both;}
#container{}
#feat{}
#menu{margin-bottom:100px;}
#footer{color:#000;border-top:1px solid #ccc;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id='wrap'>
<div id='container'>
<div id="content" >
This is the main body content
</div>
<div id='menu'>
This is the left column
</div>
<div id='feat'>
This is the right column
</div>
<div id="header">
This is the header section
</div>
</div>
<div class='clr'></div>
<div id="footer">
This is the footer information
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
|
|
|
02-25-2007, 06:44 AM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: 02-23-07
Location: USA
Posts: 860
|
Depends on the site. For blog/news sites, a fluid design (done right) can be a good idea. Users with more screen area can read more w/o scrolling.
There would need to be a max-width, though because a completely fluid design can look absolutely horrible on larger resolutions.
|
|
|
02-25-2007, 07:51 AM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
Empress™
Join Date: 08-19-04
Location: Canadian in the UK
Posts: 14,213
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Scott
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveyBoy
Don't like any of 'em! 
|
I'm with DB on this one.  It's personal preference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by graywolf
Is your dislike for fluid from a designer perspective or an end user perspective? I get the designer angle but not the end user. Could some of use please elaborate I'm extremely interested in hearing your responses.
|
Both.
I don't like things shifting around form page to page. I either use a 19" wit 1280 width or a laptop with 1024 width - that's a lot of horizontal reading. Another thing is that I like to see the page as the designer had intended it to be seen - no surprises.
|
|
|
02-25-2007, 09:04 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Contributing Member
Join Date: 08-25-06
Location: v7n
Posts: 419
|
Voted FIXED... Because fixed templates look good on all resolutions 
|
|
|
02-25-2007, 11:06 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: 12-30-05
Posts: 4
Latest Blog: None
|
Quote:
|
Another thing is that I like to see the page as the designer had intended it to be seen - no surprises.
|
Well if I paid for a 19" monitor I want 19" of content not 17" with some blank space. :-)
Not saying I don't use fixed width, but it's only when I want to "guide" and "focus" the users eyes to adsense/product/buy button.
Wonders if there is some preference correlation between liquid/fixed and the black bars on widescreen movies shown regular sized TV's?
|
|
|
02-25-2007, 11:29 AM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
Individualist
Join Date: 09-27-03
Location: Japan, mostly
Posts: 27,027
|
Quote:
|
Well if I paid for a 19" monitor I want 19" of content not 17" with some blank space. :-)
|
Exactly my feelings.
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 08:27 AM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: 12-25-04
Posts: 32
Latest Blog: None
|
Fixed. Most of the time my layouts are graphical and intricate and a fluid design just restricts me. I go with fixed whenever I can
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 08:35 AM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
Empress™
Join Date: 08-19-04
Location: Canadian in the UK
Posts: 14,213
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by graywolf
Well if I paid for a 19" monitor I want 19" of content not 17" with some blank space. :-)
|
I used my larger monitor as a large workspace, not as a larger browser space. Who on earth with their right mind would maximize browser windows on a 19"?
It's like printed books; they are usually made narrower than they are tall for a reason. You shouldn't have to move your head each time you read a line of content. 
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 08:52 AM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: 12-30-05
Posts: 4
Latest Blog: None
|
Quote:
|
Who on earth with their right mind would maximize browser windows on a 19"
|
Well if you gave me 19" of content in a liquid layout I'd get more info on the screen and have less scrolling than your fixed width design :-P
Applications like GMail and Google reader which are full width allow me to scan/view more headlines without having to scroll.
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 09:12 AM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
Empress™
Join Date: 08-19-04
Location: Canadian in the UK
Posts: 14,213
|
So you'd rather use two hands to read a newspaper than a couple of fingers to read a book? 
|
|
|
02-26-2007, 09:24 AM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: 10-13-03
Location: England.
Posts: 3,886
Latest Blog: None
|
But it's a screen not a newspaper, you can read a full width page on 19" without moving your head pretty easily
FLUID STILL SUCKS!
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:21 PM.
© Copyright 2008 V7 Inc Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
|
|