List of Directory Submission Services

[DirectoryMan]

I have just compiled a list of manual directory submission services. The list is made up of a dozen of well established submission services. Information offered includes how long they have been in the business, the types of packages and their price ranges.

[w3bmaster]

What's the scope if there are so few to choose i smell "hidden" advertisment ..

[DirectoryMan]

Originally Posted by w3bmaster

What's the scope if there are so few to choose i smell "hidden" advertisment ..

The list is comprised of services that are well established businesses. The sites include sites that I have known about for a long time and sites that rank highest in Google for the terms “directory submissions service” and “manual directory submissions service”.

[ranter]

Originally Posted by w3bmaster

What's the scope if there are so few to choose i smell "hidden" advertisment ..

I can’t trust that guy too simply because you cannot trust someone who is happened to be dishonest in a first place.

Just look at his list of what he calls “best web directories” and if you have even very little or no idea what constitutes the best, you won’t have problems to see that his list is nothing more than list of mediocre or low quality directories with less value than last year snow.

If he can’t distinguish between good and bad directory then how the hell we can trust he know which company on his list is trustworthy and which he is shoving in our throats.

I will think twice before I put my valet in his hands because first and foremost I have to trust his good fate and from what I learned about him so far, I can say: I don’t trust him

[w3bmaster]

That was my point....

[DirectoryMan]

I have been running Best web Directories for four and a half year and it is the first time I have been called anything remotely near dishonest. and it is by someone who didn't like my comments about 1 directory. I guess I should provide all positive reviews to keep guys like ranter happy. Not everyone has the same opinions on what is important with a directory.

ranter:
I told you in the previous thread that I wasn't interested in getting into a debate with you. You are upping the ante by calling me dishonest. You asking me to rate a particular directory favorably even though my experience with the directory was horrible. I can only question your motives. Is this a type of blackmail. This will be my last response to your garbage.

[DirectoryMan]

I have taken another look at our rankings of free directories and I can see how it may be possible to have a negative opinion of the list. Over the last 9 months many of the new entries to the list are directories that are actively approving free submissions over a long period of time. I kind of got tired of seeing too many directories that call themselves free even though they haven't approved a free submission in years. Other directories are only approving free submissions from extraordinary sites that don't sell anything. My users are regular people with normal websites. The reality is that few of the older free directories are approving many free submissions. To be fair, we must remember that free directories now get thousands of submissions a month. The list is designed so that these people do not waste their time submitting to the directories.

Not everyone will have the same opinion. Keeping track of directories over the long-term is a lot of work but I need to spend more time on this list.

[ranter]

[QUOTE=DirectoryMan;1089138]

Oh, you don’t like me to call you dishonest? Well, I’ll call you incompetent then

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

it is the first time I have been called anything remotely near dishonest.

Lets just say there is first time for everything

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

I guess I should provide all positive reviews to keep guys like ranter happy.

Wrong. You must provide honest reviews and keep every user of your list happy instead of sending them to spam infested directories

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

Not everyone has the same opinions on what is important with a directory.

Damn, you are so right about that. Exactly my point, you’re not an expert and your list is undeniable proof.

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

You asking me to rate a particular directory favorably even though my experience with the directory was horrible.

Don’t tell me, let me guess. AMRAY Editors rejected your submission because you were too ignorant to read and follow submission rules. How Am I doing?

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

Is this a type of blackmail.

You mean making sure that you is honest with your users and Internet Community?
If this is what you call BM, then yes, I want you to stop lying and putting based on your emotions rather than facts labels and ruin reputations just because you think you can to get away with murder.

Guess what. I won’t let you do that. I provided you with an opportunity to prove me wrong http://www.v7n.com/forums/1083572-post25.html and because you fail to do so, I have every right to call you dishonest and incompetent

[ranter]

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

I have taken another look at our rankings of free directories and I can see how it may be possible to have a negative opinion of the list. Over the last 9 months many of the new entries to the list are directories that are actively approving free submissions over a long period of time.

Oh well, according to trusted sources AMRAY is providing FREE inclusion since year 2000

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

I kind of got tired of seeing too many directories that call themselves free even though they haven't approved a free submission in years.

And what are you doing about that?

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

Other directories are only approving free submissions from extraordinary sites that don't sell anything.

What is wrong with that? Should I remind you that they are own their Indexes and have unconditional right to choose what they are adding to their list? Are you saying that just because some spammer submitted his site, manful of what they include directories must oblige him with inclusion?

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

To be fair, we must remember that free directories now get thousands of submissions a month.

Finally you got at least something right even thou in your description about AMRAY, you are accusing them being slow to include sites. Did it ever occurred to you that they have to deal with thousands submissions every day?

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

The list is designed so that these people do not waste their time submitting to the directories.

You mean like DMOZ? Wasting time to submit and then 2 or 3 years of waiting for nothing

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

Not everyone will have the same opinion.

Now they will

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

Keeping track of directories over the long-term is a lot of work but I need to spend more time on this list.

And you better start doing that now.
Your cesspool list of 12,000 spam infested directories, which most of them BTW already dead or will be on the same day when their domain expire maybe novelty for Joe and Jane because they don’t know any better than wasting their time.

So, take your time to clean your list and make it as useful as Info Vilesilencer list for example, then you may get somewhere until then you will be nothing more than slam landlord who is housing Internet’s trash.

[DirectoryMan]

ranter
You have way too much time to pursue your personal vendettas. I'm afraid that I don't have that kind of time. This is my last post on the subject, even if I have to leave the forum.

[ranter]

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

personal vendettas.

Personal vendetta?
Do you have any facts to prove your statement? Or maybe you think that by saying personal and vendetta, you will put seeds of doubts in minds of people who are following our debate.

I have no personal reasons the same way I don’t have them when I’m going after Birdie or Jim Noble. The only reason I have is to get to the bottom and to extract the truth, a positive outcome, which in a good debate will benefit people who may have very little understanding about those issues. Don’t you want to help them to understand why I’m calling your directories list spam infected graveyard?

Personal vendetta my *ss. You are the one who is attacking AMRAY even after you yourself in your post said it was old description but despite that never changed it yet. Be honest and tell us why you are going after AMRAY? What is your personal reason?

I don’t want you to leave, I want you to stick around, rebel my point and to prove me being wrong. You definitely believe that I’m wrong, so now all you need to do is show to everybody where, why and how. I am providing you with an opportunity to defend your good name, so don’t just run away, use it.

[holdem8]

Thanks for the info. I will be interested in some of their service...just bumped into this thread and good info for me. Thanks!

[seoseattle1]

WOW! I think this thread has been a turn off by people who bumped into it. RANTER you made your statement and we appreciate the flag. But geeeeze.

[seoseattle1]

OH! One more thing...
I agree with you RANTER

[robertgallagher]

hi,
It's nice information's of Directory Submission Service Provider. but i only trust in old Directory submission Service Provider i am using his Service since 2007 or so and no complain from my side or my Few Client side as well so i am only trust on some Trustworthy directory Submission service provider. and also recommend you to
seofriendlydirectory4u.com/submition.php

[ranter]

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

You are upping the ante by calling me dishonest.

Am I? How about I can prove that you are lying ****?

Originally Posted by DirectoryMan

You asking me to rate a particular directory favorably even though my experience with the directory was horrible.

Yeh, I know about your experience and now many others will know too
http://www.middlefingeraward.com/vie...97aefa394b8b62

So stop lying and next time (read my signature) try to be honest