Is DMOZ corrupt? - Page 5

rockarolla · 12-19-2008, 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdie

Now you turning into a stalker... get some help.

don't waste your bandwidth ...

Arabule · 12-19-2008, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdie

Thats a really flawed piece of logic. As I have repeatedly asked, come up with some evidence. If what you claim is true, then that editor will be removed.

Proof:

http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/searc...signforums.net

webdesignforums.net Listed more twice.

I sow other websites listed more than once, but im not in the mode to search for them

Birdie · 12-19-2008, 12:19 PM

Whats wrong with a site being listed twice?. 1000's of sites have multiple listings - some have 100's. Its well withing the guidelines. Thats not close to being evidence of corruption.

As I keep saying, come up with some evidence.

ranter · 12-19-2008, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdie

Or could it be that the corruption is just a SEO forum urban legend that keeps on getting repeated and gets repeated so many times ..

Yes, it could but without evidence you are making assumption thus attempting to highjack the topic by giving me bullsh*t response.
Where is your SEO fault evidence?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdie

As i have repeatedly asked, provide ONE piece of evidence to support that and that editor will be removed. It just don't figure that no one can come up with the goods.

Are you in process of getting job as circus clown and here in this forum taking training how to look stupid but be funny at the same time?

Read what I said and get it into your head that if any of us could get that proof, DMOZ Editors will be cut in a half. There is no direct proof accept of strong believe that Category that has only 10 links could do better than that and Editors could find at least 100 more sites from pool of millions submitted if they really want to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdie

Rubbish. You have made no case. How do you know the sites were rejected? How do you know that they are not just still waiting to be reviewed. Come up with the goods to back it up.

You have made no case. How do you know the sites were rejected?

Very good question. I don’t know if it they were or not simply because DMOZ management nothing more than bunch of ignorant morons with very low Internet Community they represent etiquette. It would be so simple to send rejection email and let people know that their sites were rejected and deleted. Such a simple act would stop un-beneficial to DMOZ endless re-submissions, stupid posts telling us about sites submitted two years ago and asking how long it will take to get listed and all sorts of DMOZ sucks posts.

So, as I said, I don’t know if site was rejected or not as I don’t know the answer to: what is the big freaking problem DMOZ have with sending notice of rejection, but what I know, every directory but DMOZ does it and DMOZ should have at least some respect to Internet Community and keep communication channels open.

Birdie · 12-19-2008, 01:28 PM

In other words, by attacking me...you have no evidence.

ranter · 12-19-2008, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdie

In other words, by attacking me...you have no evidence.

Why is that every time you pined to the wall, you are calling it an attack?

I’m trying to debate you in civilized manner by giving you an opportunity to prove me wrong but instead you’re insulting my intelligence with stupid out of place and common sense remarks as if I am one of these posters who came here to add notches to amount of posts they made.

I said it twice already: there is no direct evidence and never will and that we only can rely on circumstantial evidence and insinuating actions exhibited by DMOZ Rules and Editorial Staff who use them to get away with murder. If you wanna debate my point then open your mouth and let me hear from you some coherent arguments.

While you’re at that Corruption subject, please prove to me that ignoring whole Internet Community and treat us all as some trash is not an attribute of corrupted institution. Debate my open line of communication point

Birdie · 12-19-2008, 07:40 PM

So, in other words, you have no evidence.

rockarolla · 12-19-2008, 07:55 PM

time to ignore birds and DMOZ...

ranter · 12-19-2008, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdie

So, in other words, you have no evidence.

At this point I have more than enough to prove that you have a big mouth that puking all over this forum meaningless posts all 309 of them and who have no brains to conduct intelligent debate.

Your #310 post will be evidential proof that I’m right

Birdie · 12-19-2008, 09:14 PM

Why not just admit that you just made it up. Attacking me and making it personal does not make up for your failure to produce the evidence.

ranter · 12-19-2008, 09:42 PM

So, in other words, you have no evidence.

Ladies and Gents, I’m closing my case

Birdie · 12-20-2008, 01:16 AM

Lets deal in facts - anyone can go back and read.

1. You made a claim
2. I called you on it
3. You failed to deliver
4. You chose to attack me personally to make up for your failure

I rest my case

rockarolla · 12-20-2008, 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdie

Lets deal in facts - anyone can go back and read.

1. You made a claim
2. I called you on it
3. You failed to deliver
4. You chose to attack me personally to make up for your failure

I rest my case

See B can count!

ranter · 12-20-2008, 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Birdie

Lets deal in facts - anyone can go back and read.

1. You made a claim
2. I called you on it
3. You failed to deliver
4. You chose to attack me personally to make up for your failure

I rest my case

So, in other words, you have no evidence.

**Cricket** · 12-23-2008, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rockarolla

Sorry I'm not in the politics neither have a turn about that.

Was clear enough but you still seem not to be able to quite make it out? Aren't you?

Poking your nose here is a kind of a useful you might think? ... no it isn't. People like you must be eradicated because you are of no profit to anything - because of people like you there are wars - egoists and self confident brag and bounce elements ... people like you become something at the expense of the modest and respectable ones no matter that you couldn't make it through your O level ... so I have decided to put anyone of that sort I have met to its place ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by ranter

At this point I have more than enough to prove that you have a big mouth that puking all over this forum meaningless posts all 309 of them and who have no brains to conduct intelligent debate.

Your #310 post will be evidential proof that I’m right

Caution to all: We do NOT tolerate disrespect for members.