Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Helper
OK I had my fireproof suit on when I came into this forum. I expected flames left and right. I re-read my post and don't see anything in there that would normally quiet a thread like this. What is the deal? I was hoping to address some bashing - get into some discussion. What's up? I am not trying to cause any trouble here but I seriously thought from the tone of this thread some of the people here had something to say - if you want to say it say it. I am ready to discuss.
|
You ODP editors sure love those flames. We are a much more gentle, loving, and even friendly bunch here. But if you are wanting an honest opinion, I'll try to put off my natural shyness and let you into my own, demented world.
What's wrong with the ODP? It's similar to asking what's wrong with my septic tank. Nothing, if you like septic tanks, but it's full of crap.
1. Editor Rudeness and Close-Mindedness
ODP editors love to accuse people who who criticize the ODP of being scummy spammers. An ODP editor is the face of ODP. The ODP is not a domain. It is not a (troublesome and bug-riddled) script.
The ODP is its editors. If the editors are rude, the ODP is rude. If the editors are arrogant arses, then the ODP is an arrogant arse.
Instead of saying that sites were rejected because they were worthless, try admitting that the editors sometimes have their heads (respective and collective) up their arses so far they couldn't tell CNN.com from a one-page affiliate link farm.
It happened to me before, with
www.concrete-home.com - even though concrete-home.com is the only place on the Internet that you'll find the results of some HUD-sponsored research into ICF vs. Stick HVAC Loads.
Good sites are rejected all the time, and the assumption is always that the site is worthless unmtil proven worthwhile.
It denotes a basic lack of respect aimed at website owners.
2. ODP Policy is Made in Secret
Ya, we already dealt with this and the discussion ended with an extremely ironic "sorry, but we cannot discuss ODP policy in public".
Which just kills the convo, no?