Review : manhattanservice.com

sniperhiga · 04-23-2007, 12:19 PM

I just changed design for ManhattanService. Can you please take a look and tell what should be done. www.manhattanservice.com

bbrian017 · 04-23-2007, 01:33 PM

Looks good bro. your image is off a little on the bottom and coming into the darker background, should change that. One thing I noticed is you have lots of information and that’s really cool. As of right now I have saved it in my fav's and now I want to go back to read more

Good luck with that cheers

calvinchin · 04-23-2007, 06:26 PM

Hi there,

IMHO, the black-people picture to move up to top as a header picture.
Your logo can move down to bottom. You can put copyright or
privacy info down there too.

Try put 'Recent Work' align with the right sidebar.

For the four main menu options: Services , Clients , Content , About

... can you put these options under a drop down menu option, or
somethings like that, so that visitors won't see so many links at the top
part.

Others, so far so good..... I know you have done a good job on it...
keep it up, more improvement = better surfing experience to visitors = more visitors !

Let us know your next enhancement.

Rakien · 04-24-2007, 10:22 AM

Your site is a bit cluttered. I think you should add some borders to separate each column. The icons are a nice touch to. However, on my screen (1920 by 1600) they're rather shagged looking.

8everything · 04-24-2007, 05:49 PM

I think the upper area of the blog looks a bit plain, try adding a light grey background in that header area instead of leaving it white

sniperhiga · 04-28-2007, 04:39 PM

I did some changes which people suggested me. It is still a lot of work..... Thank you all!

Karen_Harwood · 05-25-2007, 10:15 AM

Not a bad design but some of the images need to be optimized to not only look good but to be a heck of a lot smaller in file size. For example those images that are about 200x150 in dimensions are actually much much larger and the are about 300k in file size, that's huge and they look choppy because they are being forced to display small on the page using html. These images need to be resized in an imaging program and then optimized for the web. They shouldn't any larger than 10k, smaller if you can still get a high quality image to display and don't use html to resize them. Hope this helps

sniperhiga · 05-26-2007, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Karen_Harwood

Not a bad design but some of the images need to be optimized to not only look good but to be a heck of a lot smaller in file size. For example those images that are about 200x150 in dimensions are actually much much larger and the are about 300k in file size, that's huge and they look choppy because they are being forced to display small on the page using html. These images need to be resized in an imaging program and then optimized for the web. They shouldn't any larger than 10k, smaller if you can still get a high quality image to display and don't use html to resize them. Hope this helps

I know... i just have no time. It is #1 thing for me to do.